Propsed Rule Changes From the ACT

[Robert Tawton]

Rules for the Conduct of Retrieving Trials for Gundogs
2004 amendments proposed by ACTCA RAFT Committee

Rule No.1
Current Rule
A Retrieving Trial is an event at which competitions for the working of registered Gundogs are conducted, both on land and in or through water, to determine their relative merits in the field under conditions which emulate as closely as possible those which would be found whilst shooting, but at the same time bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.

Proposed Rule
A Retrieving Trial is an event at which competitions for the working of registered Gundogs are conducted, both on land and in or through water, to determine their relative merits in the field under conditions that would be found whilst shooting, but at the same time bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.
Rationale
Deleting the words “which emulate as closely as possible those which” does not change the spirit or intention of Rule No1, but does recognise the Trials in their current form do not emulate shooting conditions as closely as possible, which in turn would imply significantly shorter runs.

Rule No 2
Current Rule
All events shall be restricted to dogs six months of age and over. The age of all dogs is computed from the date of their birth to the date on which the trial commences. Should finalisation of the trial be delayed, then the increase in age shall not affect the eligibility of the qualified contestants.

Proposed Rule
All events shall be restricted to dogs six months of age and over. The age of a dog shall be computed from its date of birth to the date on which the Trial commences. Should finalisation of the Trial be delayed, then the increase in age shall not affect the eligibility of any qualified contestant.
Rationale
Grammatical changes in line with modern usage.

Rule No 3
Current Rule
In these Rules "Gundogs and Retrievers" shall be taken as referring to all Pure Bred Gundog varieties as accepted by the Member Body. The word "dog" shall include both sexes.

Registered (Main and Limited) desexed Gundogs shall be permitted to compete in Retrieving Trials in all States and/or Territories of Australia.

Proposed Rule
Registered (Main and Limited) desexed Gundogs shall be permitted to compete in Retrieving Trials in all States and/or Territories of Australia.

Rationale
The first paragraph would be reworded and incorporated into Rule No 7 – Definitions, thereby clarifying Rule No1 and cleaning up Rule No3.

New Rule 7 (t)
Gundog - shall be taken to mean a registered pure bred dog of a variety accepted by a Member Body as a Gundog.
New Rule 7 (u)
Dog – shall be taken to mean a Gundog of either sex.


Rule No 4
Current Rule
Directives of a Member Body shall apply to a Retrieving Trial in that State/Territory and to any affiliate conducting Retrieving Trials, with the exception of National Trials, and in the event of any inconsistency the Rules of the ANKC shall apply.

At a National Retrieving Trial Championship the only Rules that shall apply are the Rules for the conduct of Retrieving Trials as approved by the ANKC.

Proposed Rule
Directives of a Member Body shall apply to Retrieving Trials in their State/Territory and to any affiliate conducting Retrieving Trials, with the exception of National Trials, and in the event of any inconsistency the Rules of the ANKC shall apply.

New Rule
At a National Retrieving Trial Championship the only Rules that shall apply are the Rules for the Conduct of Retrieving Trials for Gundogs, as approved by the ANKC.

Rationale
The proposed change amplifies the distinction between local Rules and those applicable to the National Championship.

Rule No 5
Current Rule
The function of a Retriever is to seek and retrieve fallen game, when ordered to do so. He should sit quietly with handler, or in the hide, walk at heel, or assume any station designated by his handler until sent to retrieve. When ordered a dog should retrieve quickly and briskly without unduly disturbing too much ground, and should deliver, tenderly to hand. He should then await further orders.

Proposed Rule
The function of a Retriever is to seek and retrieve fallen game, when ordered to do so. It should sit quietly with the handler or in the hide, walk at heel, or assume any station designated by the handler, until sent to retrieve. When ordered a dog should retrieve quickly and briskly without unduly disturbing too much ground. It should deliver tenderly to hand and then await further orders from the handler.


Rationale
Grammatical changes in line with modern usage.

Rule No 6
Current Rule
The Shooting and Game Laws of each State or Territory must be observed and will govern the conduct of all Trials in conjunction with the Rules and Regulations of each State or Territory Member Body.

Proposed Rule
The Shooting with Firearms and Game Laws of each State and/or Territory must be observed and will govern the conduct of all Trials in conjunction with the Rules and Regulations of each State or Territory Member Body and the ANKC.

Rationale
The proposed change clarifies the laws referred to, updates the language used and is consistent with the recommended changes to Rule No 4.

Rule No 7(c)
Current Rule
Breaking Fence - The act on the part of a dog, when walking to heel, of going through, over or under a fence, without order. All dogs should remain steady at both sides of the fence through or over which their handlers are crossing.

Proposed Rule
Breaking Fence – Is the act on the part of a dog, when walking to heel, of going through, over or under a fence, without order. A dog should remain steady at both sides of a fence through or over which its handler is crossing.

Rationale
Grammatical changes in line with modern usage.

Rule No 7 (g)
Current Rule
Control Point - is the point at which a dog and handler come into the control of the Judge and Field Steward for the purpose of commencing a run. This point shall be between the two markers set in position by direction of the Judge.

Proposed Rule
Control Point - is the point at which a dog and handler come into the control of the Judge for the purpose of commencing a Run. This point shall be between the two markers set in position by direction of the Judge.

Rationale
A competitor is solely under the control of the Judge, see Rule No 58.


Rule No 7 (j)
Current Rule
Game - Definition of - Quail, Duck, Snipe, Rabbits, Hare, Pigeons and Pheasants. The game shown above shall include any imported game bird which may be released from time to time and has established itself in the wild.

Proposed Rule
Game – the game used in Trials may include native game including quail and duck and/or introduced game that has established itself in the wild in Australia including rabbits, hare, pigeon and pheasant.

Rationale
The current Rule does not provide a clear definition and reference to snipe has been removed since they can no longer be hunted in Australia.

Rule No 8
Current Rule
Single Mark Retrieve shall be a retrieve where only one object of game is cast and is to be retrieved.

Proposed Rule
A Mark Retrieve – is a retrieve in which an item game is cast, from concealed cover, so that it can be seen by the dog while it is in the air and as it falls. A Mark Retrieve may be on land or in and/or through water. On a Mark Retrieve a dog should not need direction from its handler once it has been sent to recover game.

Rationale
The proposed changes raise the profile of the definition to address the current latitude in the interpretation of Rule 24.

Rule No 9
Current Rule
A Walk-Up Retrieve is one where the dog is walking at heel, the game is cast and shot at. Immediately the handler pauses to fire, the dog shall sit, drop or stand steady until ordered by handler to retrieve. A walk up is not permitted in a Novice or Puppy Stake or a Beginners Test.

Proposed Rule
A Walk-Up Retrieve is a Mark Retrieve wherein the game is cast while the dog is walking at heel. Immediately the handler pauses to fire at the game, the dog shall sit, stand or drop and remain steady until ordered by its handler to retrieve. A Walk-up Retrieve is not permitted in a Puppy Stake or a Beginners Test. In Novice Stakes the cast and fall of the game should generally be in line with the direction the handler has been directed to walk.

Rationale
The proposed wording emphasises that this retrieve is a variant of a Mark Retrieve and that its reintroduction into Novice Stakes is not inconsistent with a capabilities of a well trained Novice dog.

Rule No 10 (a)
Current Rule
Wounded Bird Retrieve - Bird to be thrown by Steward as in other retrieves, but to have line attached by which it is dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. Bird then picked up and fresh bird left in its stead.

Proposed Rule
Wounded Bird Retrieve – A bird to which a line has been attached is cast as in a Mark Retrieve. The bird is subsequently dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. This bird then picked up by a Steward and a fresh bird left in its stead for the dog to later retrieve.

Rationale
The proposed wording seeks to clarify the conduct of this type of retrieve. That said the ACTCA RAFT believes that this type of retrieve should be deleted since it is not possible to maintain an ambit of equality for all dogs as items of game a repeatedly dragged over the same ground. If the balance of option is to retain this style of retrieve it should be seen as a test of steadiness rather than a tracking test.

Rule 10(b)
Current Rule
Wounded Rabbit Retrieve - Rabbit to be placed by Steward as in other retrieves, but to have line attached by which it is dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. Rabbit is then picked up and fresh rabbit left in its stead.

Proposed Rule
Wounded Rabbit Retrieve – Rabbit, to which a line has been attached, is placed at a location nominated by the Judge. The rabbit is subsequently dragged for a distance of at least twenty (20) metres. This rabbit is then picked up by a Steward up and a fresh rabbit left in its stead for the dog to later recover.

Rationale
The proposed wording seeks to clarify the conduct of this type of retrieve. That said the ACTCA RAFT believes that this type of retrieve should be deleted since it is not possible to maintain an ambit of equality for all dogs as items of game a repeatedly dragged over the same ground. If the balance of option is to retain this style of retrieve then it should be seen as a test of steadiness rather than a tracking test and appropriate words should be added to the Rule to reflect this view.

Rule 11
Current Rule
A Blind Find Retrieve shall be a retrieve where a dog is in such a position that the flight, fall or placement of the game cannot be seen. The Judge may direct the dog to be placed behind a hide in close proximity to the Firing Point. Where possible it is recommended that the hide be part of the natural terrain or be constructed of natural materials.





Proposed Rule
A Blind Find Retrieve shall be a retrieve where a dog is in such a position that the flight, fall or placement of the game cannot be seen. The Judge may direct the dog to be placed behind a hide in close proximity to the Firing Point. Where possible it is recommended that the hide be part of the natural terrain or alternatively man-made portable hides should be used. .

Rationale
Natural hides require destruction of vegetation or modification of trials sites, which we should be seeking to avoid. Hay bails or cloth hides are adequate and emulate a hunting situation.

Rule No 12
Current Rule
A Double Mark Retrieve shall consist of two (2) marked retrieves and may include land and water. Except where the game is cast in a common area, game shall not be cast simultaneously and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.

Proposed Rule
A Double Mark Retrieve shall consist of two (2) Mark Retrieves and may include land and water. Except where the game is cast in a common area, game shall not be cast simultaneously and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.

Rationale
Editorial change to incorporate consistent terminology.

Rule No 13
Current Rule
A Double Blind Retrieve. The game will be located as in a double mark, with the game being placed so that the dog cannot sight them.

Proposed Rule
A Double Blind Find Retrieve. Two items of game will be separately located as for a Blind Find Retrieve and angular separation between the two items of game shall be at least 10 degrees in the case of All Age and Championship Stakes and at least 45 degrees in a Restricted Stake.

Rationale
The distances and lines that are acceptable for a Double Mark Retrieve are not the same for a Double Blind Find Retrieve. A certain minimum separation needs to be defined so that the two items of game cannot effectively be in line. This separation needs to be considerably wider in Restricted so the dog is being asked to look in a substantially different direction for each blind.


Rule No14
Current Rule
A Double Rise Retrieve shall consist of a retrieve where one object of game is cast and two shots fired in succession, before the dog is sent to retrieve and whilst the dog is returning with game, another object of game is cast or placed no further than approximately ten (10) metres from the fall of the game but at a greater distance form the firing point. The second game shall be retrieved immediately after the first game is delivered to hand. The second leg should not be treated as a blind.

Proposed Rule
A Double Rise Retrieve shall consist of a retrieve where one item of game is cast as for a Mark Retrieve at which two shots are fired in quick succession and before the dog is sent to retrieve. While the dog is returning with the first item of game, a second item of game is cast or placed approximately ten (10) metres from the fall of the first item of game, but at a greater distance from the Firing Point. The second item of game shall be retrieved immediately after the first item of game is delivered to hand. The second leg should not be treated as a Blind Find Retrieve.

Rationale
Large editorial changes and use of consistent terminology

Rule No 15
Current Rule
A Two-Bird Retrieve. First game is cast from concealed cover and one shot fired, dog is sent to retrieve game. While dog is returning to handler with game, the second game is cast and a shot fired, so that the dog may mark or hear the fall of the game. The second game should be at least twenty metres from first game and not less than forty metres from the firing point.

Proposed Rule
A Two-Bird Retrieve. The first item of game shall be cast as for a Mark Retrieve, or alternatively, it may be cast or placed as for a Blind Find Retrieve. In accordance with instructions from the Judge, the dog shall be sent to recover this item of game. While dog is returning to the handler with the first item of game, a second item of game shall be cast so that the dog may mark its fall. The second item of game should be at least twenty metres from first item of game and not less than forty metres from the firing point.

Rationale
The amended working permits the first item of game to be recovered to be either a Mark Retrieve or a Blind Find Retrieve.


Rule No 16
Current Rule
Double Fall Retrieve. First game is cast as a mark from concealed cover and one shot fired, dog is sent to retrieve game. While the dog is on the way out to retrieve, the second game is cast and a shot fired so the dog may mark or hear the fall of the game. The first game cast must be retrieved before the second. The second game must be cast to land not less than twenty metres from the line of the first and not less than forty metres from the firing point. This retrieve is restricted to “All Age” and "Championship Stakes".

Proposed Rule
Double Fall Retrieve. The first item of game is cast as a Mark Retrieve and at which one shot is fired. While the dog is on the way out to retrieve the first item of game, a second game is cast and a shot fired so the dog may mark or hear the fall of this item of game. The first item of game must be retrieved before the second item of game. The second item of game must be cast to land not less than twenty metres from the line to the first item of game and not less than forty metres from the Firing Point. This retrieve is limited to All Age and Championship Stakes.

Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity.

Rule No 17
Current Rule
A Mark and Blind Retrieve shall consist of one marked retrieve and one blind find and may include land and water.

Proposed Rule
A Mark and Blind Retrieve shall consist of one Mark Retrieve and one Blind Find Retrieve.

Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent terminology.

Rule No18
Current Rule
A Triple Mark shall consist of three marked retrieves. The game may be thrown at different angles and should be at least twenty metres apart and include land and water, terrain permitting. One retrieve should be at a fairly short distance. Game shall not be cast simultaneously, and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.

Proposed Rule
A Triple Mark shall consist of three separate Mark Retrieves. The items of game may be cast at different angles and shall be at least twenty metres apart and may include land and water, terrain permitting. One retrieve should be at a fairly short distance. Items of game shall not be cast simultaneously, and there shall be a reasonable delay between the casts.

Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent terminology.
Rule No 19
Current Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Blinds and one Marked shall consist of two blind retrieves as for a Double and one marked retrieve.

Proposed Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Blinds and one Mark shall consist of a Double Blind Find Retrieve and a Mark Retrieve.

Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent terminology.

Rule No 20
Current Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Marked and one Blind as previously described.

Proposed Rule
A Triple Retrieve with two Marks and one Blind shall consist of a Double Mark Retrieve and a Blind Find Retrieve.

Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent use of terminology.

Rule No 21
Current Rule
Through or Amongst Decoy Retrieves. No less than six decoys constructed of plastic or painted wood shall be used. The decoys should be anchored individually. Any dog that picks up a decoy and does not immediately release it without command shall be marked no score. A dog which becomes entangled in the strings and attempts to free itself should not be penalised.


Proposed Rule
Through or Amongst Decoy Retrieves. No less than six decoys, constructed of plastic or painted wood, shall be used. The decoys should be anchored individually. Any dog that picks up a decoy and does not immediately release it without command shall be marked with No Score. A dog which becomes entangled in the strings and attempts to break free shall not be penalised.

Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity.


Rule No 22
Current Rule
On multiple Retrieves the Judge may stipulate the order of retrieving. Any reasonable combination of the listed retrieves shall be permissible, provided that a dog shall not be required to pick up more than three (3) items of game in any retrieve.

Note: The direction to the Game Steward to cast the game shall be given by the Judge. Where applicable, such direction shall be given from a position out of sight of the handler and in a way that does not distract the dog.

Proposed Rule
In multiple Retrieves the Judge may stipulate the order in which items of game shall be recovered. Any reasonable combination of the listed Retrieves shall be permissible, provided that a dog shall not be required to pick up more than three (3) items of game in any Run.

New Rule
The direction to the Game Steward to cast the game shall be given by the Judge. Where applicable, such direction shall be given from a position out of sight of the handler and in a way that does not distract the dog.

Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent use of terminology.

Rule No 23 (a)
Current Rule
In Championship and All Age Stakes, a judge may order that one (1) additional item of game be placed or cast, which is not to be retrieved by the competing dog.

Proposed Rule
In All Age and Championship Stakes, a Judge may order that one (1) additional item of game be placed or cast as a diversion and this item of game shall not be retrieved by the competing dog. Items of game used as a diversion shall not be located either “in line” with or at a distance of less than 20m from an item of game that is to be retrieved. See Rule “?” for the definition of “in line”.

Rationale
Largely editorial but also seeks to clarify the conditions under which a diversionary item of game may be used.


Rule No 23 (b)
Current Rule
If any dog at any time picks up an article of game other than the nominated one it should be eliminated from further competition.

Proposed Rule
While in competition, if a dog picks up an item of game used in connection with the Trial, other than the nominated item of game, it shall be awarded No Score. In the event of a dog picking up an item of game not being used in connection with the test, it shall be given a re-run without penalty.

Rationale
Clarifies what is meant by the term “eliminated” and overcomes shortfalls in the current wording of Rule No 90, which should be deleted.

Rule No 24
Current Rule
On Marked Retrieves the dog should be able to see a bird in the air and as it falls. A dog on a Marked Retrieve should not need direction from his handler.

Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 24.

Rationale
Rule No 8 adequately describes the requirements for a Mark Retrieve.

Rule No 26
Current Rule
On Marked Retrieves, where more than one bird is to be retrieved, the order may be specified by the judge and may be considered a test of control, i.e. a handling test.

Proposed Rule
On Mark Retrieves, where more than one bird is to be retrieved, the order may be specified by the Judge and this aspect may be considered to be a test of control. Prior to sending the dog, a handler is permitted to indicate clearly to the dog which item of game it is to recover and further handling should be penalised accordingly.

Rationale
Multiple Mark Retrieves should not be treated by the handler as though they are multiple Blind Find Retrieves, but the Rule, as it now stands, could be seen to imply this. The present wording is open to misinterpretation.

Rule No 28
Current Rule
On Blind Retrieves, where possible, the course should be planned in such a way that advantage is taken of natural hazards. It should be possible, at least in theory, for a dog to find a well-planned Blind Retrieve on the initial line from his handler. The test should be so planned that the dog should be in sight at least until directed into the area of the fall, as a Blind Retrieve is a test of control and a dog that is out of sight for a considerable period cannot be said to be under control.
Proposed Rule
On Blind Find Retrieves, where possible, the course should be planned in such a way that advantage is taken of natural hazards. It should be possible, at least in theory, for a dog to find a well-planned Blind Find Retrieve on the initial line from its handler. The test should be so planned that the dog should be in sight at least until directed into the area of the fall, as a Blind Find Retrieve is a test of control and a dog that is out of sight for a considerable period of time cannot be said to be under control.

Rationale
Primarily editorial changes aimed at improving clarity and consistent use of terminology.

Rule No 29
Current Rule
Programmes must be so arranged that all dogs are thoroughly tested on land and in or through water of sufficient depth to require the dog to swim.

Proposed Rule
Programmes should be so arranged that all dogs are thoroughly tested on land and in or through water of sufficient depth to require the dog to swim.

Rationale
“Must” has been replaced with “should” to provide Judges with some degree of latitude in cases where water levels are low due to drought or when trials are conducted in flooded paddocks.

Rule No 30
Current Rule
The maximum distance for any retrieve will be 150 metres. It is desirable in a Novice Stake that runs be not more than 100 metres.

Proposed Rule
The maximum distance for any retrieve will be 150 metres. In a Novice Stake it is desirable that Runs not exceed 100 metres.

Rationale
Grammatical and editorial changes to improve clarity.

Rule No 31
Current Rule
No more than two (2) retrieves judged by the same judge may be run jointly.

Proposed Rule
No more than two (2) Runs judged by the same person/s may be linked as consecutive tests.

Rationale
Editorial changes to improve clarity.


Rule No 32
Current Rule
A "Stake" is a competition held at a Retrieving Trial and shall consist of not less than three (3) retrieves, with the exception of Puppy Stakes, which shall consist of two (2) retrieves. A Novice Stake shall consist of not less than three retrieves or more than four retrieves.

Proposed Rule
A "Stake" is a competition held at a Retrieving Trial and shall consist of not less than three (3) Runs, , with the exception of a Beginners Test, which shall consist of two (2) retrieves. A Novice Stake shall consist of not less than three Runs or more than four Runs.

Rationale
Age based Stakes are not viable in the Australian environment and should be deleted and replaced with a progression of events e.g. commencing with a Beginners Test, followed by a Novice Stake, a Restricted Stake, an All Age Stake and a Championship Stake.

Rule No 33
Current Rule
Puppy Stake is a stake confined to all Gundogs six (6) months of age and not exceeding twelve (12) months as at the date of the event.

Proposed Rule
Beginners Test is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have not won another Beginners Test or have placed in any other Stake. Beginners' Tests shall consist of two (2) Runs each of which is a Mark Retrieve, one (1) on land and one (1) in or through water.

Rationale
See Rationale attached to Rule No 32 above and this wording embraces Rule No 45 which should, as a consequence, be deleted.

Rule No 34
Current Rule
Novice Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have not won any stake other than two (2) Novice Stakes, Puppy Stakes and ‘Beginners' Tests excluded. A "Walk Up'' is not permitted in a Novice or Puppy Stake or Beginners' Test.

Proposed Rule
Novice Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have not won two (2) Novice Stakes (Beginners’ Tests excluded). A “Walk up” is permitted in a Novice Stake as per Rule 9.
Rationale
Changes in the 1st sentence are to make the eligibility requirements clearer. The second sentence is changed to align the Rule Book with our proposed change to
Rule No 9.


Rule No 35
Current Rule
Derby Stake is a stake confined to all Gundogs six (6) months of age and not exceeding two (2) years as at the date of the event.

Note: Work for Derby Stakes must not include blind finds. Work for Novice and Puppy Stakes must be single-marked retrieves, and importance must be placed on arranging runs with clear marking. All events shall be restricted to dogs six (6) months or over.

Proposed Rule
Delete Rule 35 in its entirety.

Rationale
Age based Stakes are not viable in the Australian environment and should be deleted and replaced with a progression of events e.g. commencing with a Beginners Test, followed by a Novice Stake, a Restricted Stake, an All Age Stake and a Championship Stake.

Rule No 36
Current Rule
Restricted Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have not won three (3) Restricted Stakes or an All Age Stake or been placed first or second in a Championship Stake.

Proposed Rule
Restricted Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have not won five (5) Restricted Stakes or an All Age Stake or been placed first or second in a Championship Stake. At least one Blind Find Retrieve shall be included in a Restricted Stake. It is preferable that the Blind Find Retrieve should be completed after, rather than before, a Mark Retrieve, Double Rise or Two-Bird Retrieve. In the same Run, if a Blind Find is to be completed ahead of a Mark Retrieve, the angle of separation between the two items of game shall not be less than 45 degrees.

Rationale
There is a significant gap between the levels of performance expected of All Age dogs and those competing at Restricted Stake level. Competitors from States experiencing low entry numbers are finding that dogs are being forced to compete at All Age level before they have gained sufficient experience. Increasing the number of permissible wins is seen as viable approach to allow these dogs to gain the requisite experience. The requirement for three (3) Restricted Stake wins for a dog to gain its RRD title would be retained so competitors in States with larger entries will not be significantly disadvantaged. An angular separation of 45 degrees is considered more than adequate for dogs of this standard.

Rule No 37
Current Rule
All Age Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have won a Novice or have been placed first, second or third in a Restricted Stake. A blind find must be included.



Proposed Rule
All Age Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have won a Novice Stake or have been placed first, second or third in a Restricted Stake. A Blind Find Retrieve must be included and the number of Runs shall not exceed four (4).

Rationale
Some States are conducting Championship events limited to four Runs and at the same time some Club’s are conducting All Age events with up to five (5) Runs. This imbalance can distort the perception of the relative performance of the winning dogs.

Rule No 38
Current Rule
Championship Stake is a stake confined to Gundogs that have been placed first in a Restricted or first, second or third in an All Age Stake. A Championship Stake shall consist of not less than four (4) retrieves, with at least nine (9) items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) blind finds are to be included.

A dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a hide at least once.

Note: A minimum of eight 8 bona fide exhibits and at least six (6) different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a Championship.

Proposed Rule
Championship Stake is a Stake confined to Gundogs that have been placed first in a Restricted Stake or first, second or third in an All Age Stake. A Championship Stake shall consist of not less than six (6) Runs, with at least thirteen (13) items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) Blind Find Retrieves shall be included and a dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a Hide on at least one occasion during the course of the event.

Note: A minimum of eight 8 bona fide exhibits, at least six (6) different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a Championship Stake.

Rationale
The increase in the minimum number of Runs is designed to establish a clear distinction between All Age and Championship Stakes.

Rule No 39
Current Rule
Retrieving Trial Champions are eligible only for Championship. All Age and Derby Stakes.

Proposed Rule
Retrieving Trial Champions are eligible only for Championship and All Age Stakes.


Rationale
Editorial change and the amendment wording is in keeping with the recommendation to delete Derby Stakes in their entirety.
Rule No 40
Current Rule
National Championship Retrieving Trial shall consist of not less than seven (7) retrieves with at least fifteen (15) items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) blinds are to be included.” A retrieve containing a blind find "leg" is not acceptable unless the dog is tested for steadiness from behind a hide.

A dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a hide at least twice.

Note: A minimum of eight 8 bona fide exhibits and at least six (6) different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a Championship.

No other Retrieving Trial carrying Championship points may be conducted throughout Australia on the same day as a National Championship Retrieving Trial.

Proposed Rule
National Championship Retrieving Trial shall consist of not less than eight 8 Runs with at least seventeen 17 items of game to be retrieved. At least two (2) Blind Find Retrieves are to be included and a dog must be tested for steadiness from behind a hide on at least two (2) occasions. .

Note: A minimum of twelve (12) bona fide exhibits and at least eight 8 different owners to compete before the event can be recognised as a National Championship.

No other Retrieving Trial carrying Championship points may be conducted throughout Australia on the same day as a National Championship Retrieving Trial.

Rationale
The increase in the minimum number of Runs and items of game to be retrieved is designed to establish a clear distinction between a Championship Stake and a National Championship Retrieving Trial.

Rule No 41
Current Rule
Brace Stake is a stake for two (2) dogs of different breeds or two (2) dogs of the same breed, provided they are registered Gundogs and the bona fide property of the one (1) owner.

Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 41 in its entirety.

Rationale
A Brace Stake is not relevant in the Australian environment.


Rule No 42
Current Rule
Team Stake is a stake for three (3) dogs of the same or different breeds provided they are the bona fide property of the one (1) owner.

Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 42 in its entirety

Rationale
A Team Stake is not relevant in the Australian environment.

Rule No 45
Current Rule
Beginners' Tests - Are tests provided for dogs that have never been placed in any Stake or which have never won any other Beginners' Test or Water Test.

Beginners' Tests shall consist of two (2) single-marked retrieves, one (1) on land and one (1) in or through water.

Proposed Rule
Delete Rule No 45 in its entirety

Rationale
Context included in proposed changes to Rule No 33.

Rules 46-47-48-49-50 each relate to Water Tests
Current Rules Nos.
46. A Water Test shall consist of two (2) retrieves, one (1) to be from water and one (1) across water and both to be single-marked retrieves.

47. Novice Water Test is a test for dogs which have not won any Water Test or Retrieving Trial Stake or been placed first or second in a Retrieving Trial Championship Stake (Beginners’ Test excluded).

48. Restricted Water Test is a test for dogs which have not won an All Age Water test or an All Age Stake Retrieving Trial or have been place first or second in a Championship Stake Retrieving Trial.

49 All Age Water Test is a test for dogs without restriction to age or previous performance, except that Retrieving Trial Champions cannot compete.

50. Any Judge holding a Novice Licence or higher shall be eligible to judge any Water Test.

Proposed Rule
The proposal is to delete Rules 46-50 inclusive.


Rationale
These events are rarely staged and no longer serve a useful purpose. Their deletion would bring the Rule book into line with alterations to other Field Trial rules, which have had irrelevant material removed.



Rule No 56
Current Rule
No owner or handler shall be permitted to withdraw a dog from a stake on the field or at any time during the progress of the stake, without the consent of the Judge, and without advising a Steward. Any owner or handler withdrawing his dog or dogs without such consent may be debarred from any further Trials or penalised according to the circumstances by the Committee of the Member Body.

Proposed Rule
No owner or handler shall be permitted to withdraw a dog from a Stake or at any time during the progress of the Stake, without the consent of the Judge (which will not be unreasonably withheld) and without advising a Steward. Any owner or handler withdrawing a dog or dogs without consent may be debarred from any further Trials or penalised according to the circumstances by the Committee of the Member Body.

Rationale
As a matter of courtesy an owner and/or handler should seek the Judge’s permission to withdraw any dog from a Stake, similarly, the Judge should not be in a position to deny such a request. For example, a handler may be concerned for the safety of the dog in a particular Run and therefore wish to withdraw the dog from further competition. It is undesirable to have a situation whereby the Judge could deny such a request.

Rule No 66
Current Rule
The person handling and hunting a dog may speak, whistle, and work it by hand as he may deem proper, but he may be called to order by the Judge for making any unnecessary noise or for any disorderly conduct, and if after being cautioned he persists in such noise or disorderly conduct, the Judge may order the dog to be taken up and it then shall be regarded as disqualified from the stake. An opponent's dog must not be interfered with or excited.

Proposed Rule
The person handling a dog may speak, whistle, and work it by hand as they deem proper, including using a hand to indicate to the dog which item of game it is to retrieve, but may be called to order by the Judge for making any unnecessary noise or for any disorderly conduct, and if after being cautioned they persist with such noise or disorderly conduct, the Judge may order the dog to be taken up and it then shall be regarded as being disqualified from the Stake.

Rationale
Dogs are not “hunted” in a Retrieving Trial and the revised wording further clarifies the situation of when a handler elects to use a hand cue to indicate to the dog which item of game it is to retrieve.

Rule No 86
Current Rule
The dog shall retrieve the game cleanly and without delay shall return direct to the handler and shall deliver straight to hand in front of the handler from standing or sitting position, and as instructed by the Judge. The dog shall be stationary at delivery.

Proposed Rule
The dog shall retrieve the game cleanly and without delay return directly to the handler and shall deliver, within hand’s reach of the handler (e.g. in front of or at the handler’s side), from standing or sitting position. The dog shall be stationary at delivery.

Rationale
Dog’s should be allowed to deliver anywhere within a tight semi-circle from the left to the right side heeling position of the handler. While delivering to the side, dogs often demonstrate that they have remembered the location of other game by aligning themselves in the relevant direction.

Rule No 103
Current Rule
The title of Novice Retrieving Trial Dog (N.R.D.) and/or Restricted Retrieving Trial Dog (R.R.D.) may be awarded to those dogs which are no longer eligible to compete in those stakes because of wins in those stakes or wins/placing in higher classes. (This Rule will be effective for dogs entering trials as from 1/1/1988 and those completing qualification after that date.)

Proposed Rule
The title of Novice Retrieving Trial Dog (N.R.D.) may be awarded to those dogs that are no longer eligible to compete in Novice Stakes because of wins in those Stakes or wins/placing in higher classes. (This Rule will be effective for dogs entering trials as from 1/1/1988 and those completing qualification after that date.)

New Rule
The Restricted Retrieving Trial Dog (R.R.D.) may be awarded to those dogs that have won three (3) Restricted Stakes or are no longer eligible to compete at this level because of wins/placing in higher classes. (This Rule shall be effective for dogs entering trials as from 1/1/1988 and those completing qualification after that date.)

Rationale
In the interests of advancing the sport and to assist handlers and/or dogs gain additional experience before being excluded from competing at Restricted level, it has been recommended (see proposed Rule No 36) that the total number of Restricted wins be increased to five (5). Nevertheless, it is felt that the number of wins at Restricted level necessary to gain the RRD Title should not be increased fro the current criteria.


Rule No 113
Current Rule
Judges shall not show their sheets to any unauthorised person. The sheets must be retained by the judge. Judge's Sheets must be checked and signed by the Judge and Chief Steward and the points announced for all place awards at the conclusion of the Trial.

Should any competitor request details of how he was scored on any retrieve, the judge may make this information available to that competitor. The Judge may, at his discretion, show a competitor his/her score sheet.

Proposed Rule
Judges shall not show their sheets to unauthorised persons. The sheets must be retained by the Judge. Judge's Sheets must be checked and signed by the Judge and Chief Steward and at the conclusion of the Trial and the aggregate points shall be announced for all place awards.
As a minimum, at the conclusion of the presentation of trophies, the Run by Run scores of all dogs completing the Trial shall be made available to interested parties.
Should any competitor failing to complete the Trial request details of how he/she was scored on any Run, the Judge shall make this information available to that competitor. The Judge may, at his discretion, show a competitor his/her score sheet.

Rationale
Under current Rules and practice, a Retrieving Trial is possibly the only competition in Australia where a competitor’s progress throughout the Trial is known only to the Judge. It is considered that the sport would benefit from adopting a more transparent approach. This could be achieved by making the Run by Run scores of all competitors completing the Trial available for the information of interested parties. The proposed approach does not create any additional work on behalf of the Judge or Officials since the scores of all competitors completing the Trial are routinely tallied in order to establish the final outcome of the Trial.

New Rule
Items of game shall be considered to be “in line” when the angle of separation is less than 11 degrees. In practical terms, 11 degrees equates to a 10 metre separation at a distance of 50 metres; a 20 metre separation at a distance of 100 metres and a 30 metre separation at a distance of 150 metres. The Judge shall not specify the order of pick-up if items of game are deemed to be “in line” and that decision shall be left to the handler’s discretion.

Rationale
It is considered that in situations where items of game are deliberately cast or placed “in line” and the Judge specifies that the “back” item of game is to be retrieved first, the scenario calls for levels of control that are outside the spirit of the sport. There is a widely held view that Runs of this type are designed to eliminate competitors rather than to produce fair competition that can be assessed in an appropriate manner and suitable safeguards are required.


Proposed Change to Score Sheet
Change
Amend the Score Sheet to include a new category entitled “Breaking from the Hide” with a deduction of up to 5 points.

Rationale
Over time this misdemeanour has not been treated in a consistent manner by all Judges and has been assessed under a variety of categories including; Steadiness, Obedience and Walking to Heel; Breaking to Shot and Failure to Obey Command and Direction. Creating a dedicated category is seen as an appropriate solution this dilemma. The recommendation that the penalty be limited to a maximum of 5 points was reached after considering the relative importance of;
a. Breaking to Shot - max 10 points
b. Hard mouth - max 10 points
c. Blinking and over-running game - max 5 points
d. Dropping game - max 5 points, and
e. Not firing from the shoulder - max 5 points
Breaking from the hide, either before or after the shot is fired (but before the dog is called by the handler), is assessed as a lesser fault than a. and b. above and more in keeping with faults c, d, and e.

Restructure of the Rule Book
In its present form related Rules are not always presented together and this makes for difficult reading and understanding, particularly for new-comers to the sport. A number of Rules include Notes and their status in not clear. Perhaps they should be made into separate and distinct Rules.
Reordering the Rules Book along the following lines is recommended and bringing it to fruition may require a Working Party to be established in which the ACTCA is filling to participate.
Purpose (Rules 1, 5, 27, 4, and 6)
Definition of Terms (Rule 7)
Retrieves (Rules 8, 24, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 30, 22, 26, 29, 23, 25, 26, 28, 31)
Stakes and Eligibility (Rules 2, 3, 32, 45, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 43, 44)
Required entries (Rules 51, notes 38, and 40)
Judges (Rules 111, 71, 72, 73,)
Duties of Trial manager and stake managers (Rule 92)
Duties of Gun steward (Rule 93f)
Duties of Game stewards (Rule 93a-e,g)
General Regulations for Conduct of a Trial (Rules 52, 60, 58, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 67, 69, 70, 74, 75)
Procedure for Conducting Trials (Rules 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91),
Method of Scoring (Rules 112, 113, 114, Score Sheet)
Awards (Rules 110b, 110a, 97, 98, 99, 110, 101, 102, 94, 95, 104, 105, 106)
Titles (Rules 103, 107, 108, 109).


New Rule
The title of RT Grand Champion may be awarded to any dog that is awarded at total of 120 Championship points, of which not less than eighteen 18 have been awarded in Championship Stakes.
The title of RT Grand Championship will not be awarded to dogs retrospectively, but a dog will be eligible to be awarded the title of RT Grand Champion, if it gains a minimum of twelve (12) points towards the title of RT Grand Champion (120 points) on or after the implementation date of 1.1.2005.

Rationale
To place Retrieving Trial titles on a comparable to those in the “conformation world” and is a just and fitting reward for outstanding achievement in the field. The requirement to gain at least eighteen points in Championship Stakes requires significant merit and ensures that the title of RT Grand Champion will not be obtained simply because a Member State has fewer dogs in competition.

Document entitled “Guidelines for Judges”
For some time there has been considerable interest in having developed a document containing a series of guidelines for Judges. The ACTCA RAFT has responded to this need and the following draft document is attached for consideration and implementation. It is acknowledged that it will be extremely difficult to gain universal acceptance of every facit contained in the draft document, nevertheless, it should be recognised that its contents are only “guidelines” and do not alter, or in any other way impact on, the official ANKC Rules for the Conduct of Retrieving Trials for Gundogs. The guidelines are there to promote a level of consistency across the country in the conduct of Trials, the standard of Runs, interpretations of the Rules and the principles underpinning the assessment of the performance of dogs in competition.

It may be necessary for the National RAFT Committee to establish a Working Party to bring together the final document. Members of the Working Party will need to be computer literate and have ready access to the appropriate resources, if the “Guidelines for Judges” document is to be finalised before 1 Jan 2005.

RETRIEVING TRIALS FOR GUNDOGS

Guidelines for Judges

Preamble

Directives issued by a Member Body shall apply to a Retrieving Trial in that State/Territory and to any affiliate conducting Retrieving Trials, with the exception of the National Trial, but in the event of any inconsistency, the Rules of the ANKC shall apply. At a National Retrieving Trial Championship only the ANKC Rules shall apply. Consequently, nothing contained in these Guidelines shall be considered as altering and/or amending the ANKC Rules in any way whatsoever. Recommendations relating to the interpretation and application of the Rules are therefore for guidance purposes aimed at promoting increased uniformity in the conduct of Retrieving Trials and the impartial assessment of the competitors.
The objectives of these Guidelines are twofold:
Firstly, to promote greater uniformity in the conduct of Retrieving Trials, including the standard of Runs set in the various Stakes; and
Secondly, to facilitate greater uniformity in how Judge’s assess the relative merits of dogs competing in Retrieving Trials. In respect to evaluating a dog’s performance, these Guidelines include a set of recommendations for grading the performance of dogs so that there will be greater uniformity in the penalties imposed for various faults.

Recommendations

ANKC Rule No 1 states;

A Retrieving Trial is an event at which competitions for the working of registered Gundogs are conducted, both on land and in or through water, to determine their relative merits in the field under conditions which emulate as closely as possible those which would be found whilst shooting, but at the same time bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.

The phrase, “conditions which emulate as closely as possible to those which would be found whilst shooting” should be interpreted for the purposes of the Rules as “natural hunting conditions”. At all times Judges should be mindful of the requirement to “bring the work of each dog within an ambit of equality where assessment may be fairly made.” This includes, as far as is practical, ensuring that there are no significant changes in the colour of game especially that used for “marked retrieves”. Judges are encouraged to oversee the sorting of game in order to circumvent any difficulties that may arise and to maximize the “ambit of equality”.
.
ANKC Rule No 5 states;
The function of a Retriever is to seek and retrieve fallen game, when ordered to do so. It should sit quietly with the handler or in the hide, walk at heel, or assume any station designated by its handler until sent to retrieve. When ordered, a dog should retrieve quickly and briskly without unduly disturbing too much ground, and should deliver, tenderly to hand. It should then await further orders.

ANKC Rule No 24 states;
On Marked Retrieves the dog should be able to see a bird in the air and as it falls. A dog on a Marked Retrieve should not need direction from its handler.


ANKC Rule No 27 states;
A dog that marks the fall of a bird, used the wind, and will take direction from his handler is of great value.
Perhaps more than any others, Rule Nos 5 and 27 encapsulate the necessity for team work between handler and dog. A dog that has marked the fall of game and been sent to retrieve should, in general terms, require no further direction from the handler (ref ANKC Rule No 24). Deductions from a perfect score should be commensurate with the deficiencies shown in marking and memory.

Judges should be discouraged from setting Runs which are aimed at discounting the need for teamwork by consciously locating handlers in positions where they cannot help their dog. “Natural hunting conditions” are subject to great variation across the length and breadth of Australia, the work expected of dogs should not be subject to similar wide variations. In most instances, there should be little doubt in anyone’s mind as to the type of work that constitutes a perfect performance on any given Run. Nevertheless, there are unlimited opportunities for honest difference-of-opinion on the severity of the penalty to be applied to any given infraction or deviation from perfect work.

The possibility therefore exists for handlers to become confused and/or dismayed when their dog is not included in the placings due to faults, which a Judge in another Trial did not penalise so severely. However, this should be minimized, as everyone has the right to know which particular faults will be penalised severely, moderately, or only to a minor degree. It therefore follows that some clarification and/or guidance is required; hence, a variety of faults and their suggested classifications may be found at the back of this Guide.


ANKC Rule 7 (a) states;
Action and Style - These are both seen in a fearless, well-trained dog that covers its ground with good free movement, head well held, and tail swinging nicely from side to side.
The style and capabilities of each particular breed should be taken into account when making an assessment. Action and Style do not relate to speed alone. The assessment should take into account factors such as; how keen and willing is the dog to work with its handler and to promptly accept commands, how keen and willing is the dog to perform the act of retrieving.

ANKC Rule 7 (b) states;
Blinking - Any dog that finds and deliberately passes by the game, either through nervousness or bad training is a "blinker".
A dog that blinks game and then begins to hunt in the wrong area should be penalized 1 - 5 points. Indicators such as the dog pausing over game and looking back toward the handler should be used by the Judge to confirm that game has been ignored. The Judge must be certain in his/her mind that blinking has in fact occurred before applying the penalty and it is not simply a case of misjudgement by the dog or the Judge.

ANKC Rule 7 (d) states;
Breaking from the Hide - A dog will be deemed to have broken from the hide if he moves outside the area designated by the Judge as the hide. Any movement by the dog within the area of the hide shall be classed as unsteadiness only.
If a dog breaks from the hide to a position where it would be able to see the game placed, cast, or the handler firing at the game and is then replaced before the shot is fired – apply 5 point penalty.

Breaking to Shot from a Hide - if a dog breaks from the hide before a shot is fired, it is should be seen as being less steady than a dog that waits in the hide until it hears a shot (or two in the case of a Double Blind) and then breaks. It would therefore seem inconsistent to increase the penalty for this infraction over that discussed immediately above. By definition, there has been no attempt to retrieve (only to rejoin the handler) – apply a 5 point penalty.

If a dog moves from the hide, but stops in an area not insight of the handler or of game being cast or placed – may be returned to the hide and a deduction for unsteadiness would be applied – apply a penalty of 3 Points.

A dog moving from hide position before the shot is fired may be repositioned once only.

If a dog comes out of the hide and sees the blind being placed or game cast and is deemed to have gained an unfair advantage, it should be disqualified.

ANKC Rule 7 (e) states;
Breaking to Shot - If a dog makes a forward movement which in the opinion of the Judge indicates a deliberate attempt to retrieve without being ordered to do so, that dog shall be deemed to have broken. If a dog makes a slight break and is brought immediately under control it shall be penalised for unsteadiness.
Controlled Break - up to 5 points deduction (dog stopped in the field and redirected).
If the dog breaks and continues to retrieve – 10 point deduction.

ANKC Rules 7 (f, g& i) collectively state;
f) Control Area - is that area encompassed by the control point markers and the firing point markers.
g) Control Point - is the point at which a dog and handler come into the control of the Judge and Field Steward for the purpose of commencing a run. This point shall be between the two markers set in position by direction of the Judge.
i) Firing Point - is the point from which the handler will fire a gun and direct the dog to retrieve.

Note: Terrain permitting, the distance between the Control Point and the Firing Point shall be not less than ten metres and the distance between the two marker pegs at the Firing Point shall be not less than 1.5 metres.

Judges are encouraged to be very specific in their briefing to handlers on where they are to control their dog.
Handlers moving either forward or backward from the Firing Point should be penalized, accordingly, and this may even lead to receiving a zero score (No Score) – if it is deemed to be an attempt to gain an unfair advantage.
A dog that picks up a previously retrieved item of game prior to being sent for the next leg of a retrieve – 5 point penalty

N.B. A previously retrieved item of game refers to game retrieved by the dog in the current Run and not items of game that have been retrieved in other Runs and that have inadvertently been left where the dog may be tempted to retrieve them.

ANKC Rule No 7 (l) states;
Hard Mouth - A dog is deemed to be hard-mouthed when there is unmistakable evidence of any markings or damage on game retrieved due to biting or crunching by the dog. The penalty as defined on the score sheet should be relative to the marking or damage. Where there is deliberate squeezing of game so that the bones break and the Judge considers that the game is unfit for the table, the Judge may apply Rule 58 and disqualify the dog.
Note: Game can be marked when thrown and this should be considered.

A dog should be penalised for hard-mouth (damaging game), but, before doing so, the Judge should inspect the bird and be satisfied that the dog alone is responsible for the damage.

"Hard-mouth" is one of the most severely penalized faults in a retriever; furthermore, once a dog has been charged with this fault, it carries that stigma for life. Therefore, "hard-mouth" should become the Judges' verdict only when there is incontrovertible proof of it. In most cases, torn skin or flesh, alone, is not sufficient since damage of this type may be caused in a variety of ways, such as by sharp sticks and stones, etc., in the cover. Usually crushed bone structure can be accepted as trustworthy and sufficient evidence of "hard-mouth”. Pigeons with broken backs may not be a case of “hard mouth” since this type of damage may occur when the bird falls on hard or stony ground. Various types of inconclusive evidence should merely be recorded by the Judge pending the manner in which the dog handles game in subsequent Runs.

If a dog is found to have demonstrated “extreme hard-mouth” it should be eliminated from the Stake. For damage to game not amounting to “extreme hard mouth”, a deduction of up to 10 points per incident may be applied. A cumulative penalty should be applied where damage to more than one item of game has occurred. When a dog has reached a total of 20 points for damage to game over the course of a trial, ANKC Rule No 58 should be applied, and the dog disqualified.

Other faults are frequently confused with "hard-mouth," although, in reality, they are entirely separate and distinct from it. "Freezing," in particular, falls into this category. A hard-mouthed dog may be gentle at delivery and, certainly, a sticky delivery does not imply hard-mouth. "Rolling-a-bird" or "mouthing" it, while making the retrieve, may be erroneously associated with "hard-mouth" in the opinion of some, even though the bird is not damaged. . If such "mouthing" is a fault at all, then it is of only minor importance.

ANKC Rule 7 (p) states;
Obedience - The spontaneous action of obeying all commands. Dogs should act readily and not cower or cringe at their handler's signs, sounds or commands.

Judges should look for obedience and steadiness not only between the pegs, but throughout the complete Run. The 10 point allocation for steadiness, obedience and walking to heel should be limited to behaviour “between the pegs”.

ANKC Rule 7 (r) states;
Retrieving - The retrieving covers the performance of the dog from when ordered to retrieve until it delivers the game to its handler.
Judges should be looking for eagerness both on the way out and on the return, directness on the way out and on the return, marking ability, and use of nose, ears and eyes.

ANKC Rule No 16 states;

Double Fall Retrieve. First game is cast as a mark from concealed cover and one shot fired, dog is sent to retrieve game. While the dog is on the way out to retrieve, the second game is cast and a shot fired so the dog may mark or hear the fall of the game. The first game cast must be retrieved before the second. The second game must be cast to land not less than twenty metres from the line of the first and not less than forty metres from the firing point. This retrieve is restricted to "All Age" and "Championship Stakes".

Seeks to simulate a natural hunting situation wherein a dog marks the fall of game and is sent to make the retrieve. As the dog is making its way towards the fallen game, other game lurking nearby flushes and is shot by the handler. The well trained dog should stop shot and acknowledge the fall of the second item of game before returning to its original task, with or without a command from its handler. Judges are reminded of the requirements listed in ANKC Rule 16, and especially that the first item of game to be retrieved, must be a cast as a Mark. Furthermore, for this retrieve to “work”, the dog must be in a position to see the second item of game cast or to hear it fall. When a dog’s attention is focused on retrieving the first item of game, its ability to see the second item of game cast will be severely constrained, especially if it must solely rely on its peripheral vision. It is therefore desirable that, relative to the line from the Firing Point to the first item of game and the position of the dog, the angle to the second item of game should not exceed 60 degrees. Casting the second item of game while dogs are descending a hill should also be avoided. The use of a duck call a precursor to casting the second item of game is worthy of serious consideration as it introduces an ambit of equality for all dogs as does conducting this test in water.

ANKC Rule 22 states;
On multiple Retrieves the Judge may stipulate the order of retrieving. Any reasonable combination of the listed retrieves shall be permissible, provided that a dog shall not be required to pick up more than three (3) items of game in any retrieve.

Rules 8 through 21 describe the format for the range of retrieves permitted in any Run. Rule 22 allows for any reasonable combination of the prescribed retrieves, provided always that no more than three items of game shall be picked up in any one Run. When a Judge uses Rule 22 to build a so called “triple”, Judges are encouraged to describe the test in terms of the specific Retrieves used to construct the Run e.g. A Single Mark Retrieve coupled with a Double Blind Retrieve.

ANKC Rule 23 states;
(a) In Championship and All Age Stakes, a judge may order that one (1) additional item of game be placed or cast, which is not to be retrieved by the competing dog.

(b) If any dog at any time picks up an article of game other than the nominated one it should be eliminated from further competition.

The circumstances applicable to the use of a “Diversionary Bird” or “No-No Bird” (see Rule 23 (a) above) are open to a wide range of interpretations. Accordingly, Judges shall ensure that situations surrounding its use complies with the criteria that it “emulates as closely as possible those which would be found whilst shooting”. A Diversionary or No-No Bird should not be placed in line with game that is to be retrieved or within 15m of that game and/or the line to it.

ANKC Rule 23 (b) should be read and implemented in conjunction with ANKC Rule 90 which states; Dogs retrieving any feather or fur, other than the object designated to be retrieved, and deemed by the Judge to have been picked up in the area of the run, will be run again without penalty.


ANKC Rule 24 states;
On Marked Retrieves the dog should be able to see a bird in the air and as it falls. A dog on a Marked Retrieve should not need direction from his handler.

Dogs cannot mark the fall of game it cannot or did not see. In setting “Marks”, Judges should be mindful of the need for equality for all competitors and should take into account such factors as; the nature and contrast of the background against which the flight of the bird is visualized, the prevailing light conditions, as well as the height to which the birds are thrown. The position of the sun relative to the line of sight of a mark shoul

[Robert Tawton]

Hi All,

Due to limitations in the software the balance of the ACt sumission follows;

ANKC Rule 24 states;
On Marked Retrieves the dog should be able to see a bird in the air and as it falls. A dog on a Marked Retrieve should not need direction from his handler.

Dogs cannot mark the fall of game it cannot or did not see. In setting “Marks”, Judges should be mindful of the need for equality for all competitors and should take into account such factors as; the nature and contrast of the background against which the flight of the bird is visualized, the prevailing light conditions, as well as the height to which the birds are thrown. The position of the sun relative to the line of sight of a mark should be considered where a Run may take several hours to complete as is often the case with a large number of competitors. If cover, or any other obstacle, is present in the immediate foreground, the stature of the competing breeds should also be taken into consideration. The duration for which the flight can be observed is another key factor and Judges are encouraged to ensure that dogs are afforded a reasonable time in which to “see” the bird. In the case of multiple Marks, it is recommended that the delay between the first Mark hitting the ground and the start of the cast of the second Mark should not be less than 2 seconds.

ANKC Rule 25 states;
Accurate marking or memory of falls is of paramount importance. However, this does not imply that dogs that excel in marking should not be penalised for other faults. Ability to mark does not necessarily imply pinpointing the fall. A dog that misses the fall on the cast but recognises the depth of the area of the fall, stays in it, and quickly and systematically hunts it out has done a creditable and intelligent job of marking.

Even with “Marks” a handler may be able to render great assistance to the dog by giving it a “clear indication” in the direction of the fall and this is especially so in the case of multiple retrieves. However, there is nothing a competitor can do short of handling, to aid the dog in recognising the “depth of the fall”. Often a dog gives a definite indication of memory and of its marking ability, at or after the delivery of the first bird, by aligning itself toward, or by looking eagerly in the exact direction of an un-retrieved “fall”; at times leaving on command but without the benefit of a “clear indication” to the fall being given to it by the handler. There is no invariable method by which the relative merits of such perfect completions can be judged; the dog trained to come to heel and briskly given a “clear indication” in the same manner for each and every retrieve, including the first, should not be penalised for such work – not even relatively, in comparison with a more spontaneous style of work. See also ANKC Rule 66 for further clarification. The observant Judge will be able to distinguish between the dog being given a “clear indication” to the item of game to next be retrieved, and a dog that is being “lined” toward game it has forgotten or did not see to mark its fall and the difference should be assessed appropriately.

What precisely defines the “area of the fall” defies accurate description; yet, before the start of every Run the Judge must assign boundaries for each and every “fall” so that a decision can be made as to whether the dog has remained within the “area of the fall”, or alternatively how far it has wandered away from “the area” and how much cover it has un-necessarily disturbed. In determining these arbitrary boundaries for the “area of the fall”, due consideration should be given to a range of factors such as; 1) the type, height and uniformity of the cover, 2) the prevailing light conditions, 3) the direction and strength of the prevailing wind, 4) the length of the specific retrieve, 5) the speed and hunting style of each individual dog. Finally and most importantly, 6) there should be a separate “area of fall” for each and every bird and their size will depend on whether the Judge is considering the “area of fall” for a single mark retrieve, or the first bird a dog is sent for in a multiple retrieve, or for the second and/or third bird, since each of these “areas” should differ each from one another.

In general, the “area of the fall” for a Single Mark Retrieve should be relatively small; the area for the first bird to be retrieved in a “double” should be smaller than for the second bird, and both of these should be larger in a “triple” and larger still for the third bird in the triple. Also, “the area” for short retrieves should certainly be smaller than for long retrieves. Deductions applied should vary depending on the distance an individual dog wanders out of the “area”, the frequency of such wanderings, the number of mismarked birds in any given Run, and by the amount of cover disturbed by these meanderings.

Dogs that disturb cover unnecessarily and are clearly well out of the area of the “fall”, either by not going directly to the “area”, or by leaving it, even though they eventually find the bird without being handled, should be penalized more severely than those handled quickly and obediently to the game. In general, the handler that recognises that the dog has failed the primary feature of the test i.e. to mark the fall of game and seeks to recover the situation with a few quick handles should be deemed to have done a better job than a dog that is left to find the bird by the so called “paddock method”.

ANKC Rule 26 states;
On Marked Retrieves, where more than one bird is to be retrieved, the order may be specified by the judge and may be considered a test of control, i.e. a handling test.

In the context of this Rule, the phrase, “may be considered a test of control” refers to the handler’s ability to indicate to the dog the order in which the items of game are to be retrieved. It does not refer to the dog’s performance while it is in the process of actually recovering the game. Dogs that require handler intervention to locate the game should not score as highly as those who accurately mark and remember the “area of the fall”.

ANKC Rule 28 states;
On Blind Retrieves, where possible, the course should be planned in such a way that advantage is taken of natural hazards. It should be possible, at least in theory, for a dog to find a well-planned Blind Retrieve on the initial line from his handler. The test should be so planned that the dog should be in sight at least until directed into the area of the fall, as a Blind Retrieve is a test of control and a dog that is out of sight for a considerable period cannot be said to be under control.

Utilising natural hazards should obviate the need for Judges to issue special instructions about the manner in which a Blind Retrieve should be completed, other than get the game by the shortest or most direct route.

ANKC Rule 30 states;
The maximum distance for any retrieve will be 150 metres. It is desirable in a Novice Stake that runs are not more than 100 metres.

Of primary importance, retrieves should approximate “natural hunting conditions”. Nevertheless, “falls” which are long and out of gun range for the handler are appropriate and proper; they can be justified on the basis that a bird can fly a considerable distance after it has been shot, or has been shot by a hunting companion. Judges should take all reasonable steps to ensure that the specified distances are not exceeded. When significant doubt exists the length of retrieves can be paced out or a measuring tape, laser binocular and/or GPS instrument can be used. The length of any retrieve should be proportional to the difficulty presented by the terrain.

ANKC Rule 59 states;
The course over which a stake shall be run shall be selected by the Judge and, where possible, two (2) members of the Trial Committee conducting the Trial. Such Committee members shall be appointed at a Trial Committee meeting preceding the Trial and shall be members who are not competing in the particular stake for which they have selected the runs.

Planning of tests is foremost the responsibility of the Judge; it is also one of their most important tasks. With good tests, it is far easier to assess the quality of the performances by the various dogs, than could be said if the Runs are so simple and so easy that most competitors turn in near perfect performances. Similarly, tests that are at the other extreme should be avoided. Tests that are too difficult and time consuming, or are too “tricky” and so produce many failures, fall into the ‘extreme’ category.
Ingenuity on the part of the Judge should be encouraged, not only in planning regular tests, but also in devising some which are unusual and quite different from those customarily set at Retrieving Trials. Nevertheless, all such unusual tests should conform to “those which would be found whilst shooting” and be underpinned by ANKC Rules 8 through 21 or combinations permitted under ANKC Rule 22.

In order to minimise possible problems with the mechanics of Runs, Judges should encourage Trial Managers to view the runs prior to commencement of the Trial.

Viewing grounds, selecting areas and presetting and testing Runs before a trial (wherever possible) is recommended. If this is not possible, Judges should make themselves available for a suitable period prior to the commencement of their Stake.


ANKC Rule 80 states;
The Game Steward shall when directed by the judge, cast the game in the area and in such manner as previously directed by the Judge, and where applicable from a position out of sight of the handler and in a way that does not distract the dog.

ANKC Rule 80 should be read in conjunction with ANKC Rule 93 (e) which states;
The Game Stewards will at all times be hidden from sight of both handler and dog. The Game and Gun Stewards will refrain from unnecessary movement and the Gun Steward will ensure that the gun is broken at all times when not actually in use. Game to be retrieved must be at least ten (10) metres from the Game Steward.

It is generally understood that Game Stewards will be hidden from sight of both handler and dog when the game is cast.

Maintaining an ambit of equality for all competitors is of paramount importance. In the event of a mis-cast, or any other untoward occurrence, it is preferable that only the Judge should call NO BIRDS. Nevertheless, situations do arise where the Judge may not be in a position to precisely observe whether or not game falls within the area designated by the Judge. In such situations and if minor deviations in the fall of game are likely to impact on the “ambit of equality”, the Judge should appoint a Steward to monitor the situation and if necessary call NO BIRD.- ANKC Rule 92 (e) refers.

In a Restricted or an All Age Stake, if a dog proceeds to retrieve a NO BIRD, then the dog shall be deemed to be out of control and the dog shall be marked with a “No Score”.
If the dog has been sent prior to the Judge, or Steward, calling "NO BIRD" and the dog proceeds to retrieve the game, the dog shall not necessarily be deemed to be out of control. In this or similar circumstances, the final determination shall be at the Judge’s discretion.

ANKC Rule 81 states;
The handler or Gun Steward shall, while the game is in the air and as near as possible to the apex of its flight, aim at the game and fire his gun from the shoulder and in the normal shooting posture. Unless otherwise directed by the Judge, the normal shooting posture will mean the handler or steward will be standing.

When making an assessment the Judge should take note of the following:

That the handler 1. Fires with the stock at the shoulder (Up to 5 point deduction for non-compliance)
2. Fires at the apex of flight
3. Fires at the nominated game
4. Fires in a standing (“normal shooting”) position (unless instructed otherwise).

Deductions for failure to comply with (2, 3, or 4 above) should be commensurate with any advantage sought or gained by the handler.

Before an item of game can be retrieved a shot must be fired in the general direction of the game (except for misfires). In the event of deliberate non-compliance in order to gain an advantage the dog shall be disqualified – ANKC Rule 60 - Failure to obey a Judge’s instruction refers. If the Judge considers that by reminding the handler of the need to “fire” the gun no material advantage has been gained, a 5 point penalty should apply.

ANKC Rule 86 states;
The dog shall retrieve the game cleanly and without delay shall return direct to the handler and shall deliver straight to hand in front of the handler from standing or sitting position, and as instructed by the Judge. The dog shall be stationary at delivery.

Judges are reminded of the requirement for dogs to be stationary at delivery. Refusing to deliver (e.g. sticky delivery, not releasing the bird immediately on command), should be penalised according to the severity of the offence and in extreme cases, may result in a zero score.

ANKC Rule 89 states;
The dog should at no time drop the game during a retrieve until ordered to deliver by the handler. Any dog doing so shall be penalised according to the seriousness of the offence. The dog will have completed the retrieve when the game is brought within reach of the handler and an attempt is made to deliver without the handler stepping towards the dog. If the game is dropped during an attempt to deliver within reach of the handler, the penalty is for dropping game.

In the event of a dog deliberately dropping an item of game- maximum deduction 5 points
Game accidentally dislodged from dogs mouth - deduction 1 - 5 points
Note: The repositioning of game without releasing it should not be penalized.

ANKC Rule 114 (a) states;
On completion of the Trial the Judge shall complete and sign a Judge's Certificate or official catalogue of the event indicating:

(a) Placegetters. Only dogs worthy of the award of Championship points may be shown as first, second or third placegetters in Stakes carrying Championship points.

In All Age or Championship Stakes placings should only be awarded if the performances of the dogs are worthy of championship points.
If, in the opinion of the Judge, the appropriate standard is not maintained, the Judge must then inform the handler that their dog is out of competition - no score, and at the discretion of the Judge may continue in the Stake.
Judges should familiarize themselves with the standard of work required at every level and they should not vary this because of up-coming events such as State or National Championships.

General
ANKC Rules 7(o), 58, 60, 66 and 99 relate to situations where No Score or Disqualification apply. Judges should ensure that they are conversant with the circumstances relative to the application of these two penalties. Put simply, when a dog receives a No Score it becomes Non Competitive but may continue in the Stake at the discretion of the Judge. A dog that is disqualified must immediately retire from the Stake.

Giving Tongue is a fault listed on the Score Sheet that is included within the ANKC Rules. Nevertheless, there is no specific Rule that addresses this issue. Dogs that give any audible sound - to be penalized 1 - 5 points depending on the severity of the offence.

Marking Territory is a fault and points should be deducted from the retrieve, e.g. 1 - 5 points for each offence depending on the circumstances. Marking on the way out to make a retrieve is considered more serious than marking on the return, or covering the spot where a bitch may have previously urinated. Defecating is also a fault, usually stemming from the lack of opportunity to properly “air” or a nervous disposition. Because of its random and less frequent nature, it is seen as less important than Marking Territory.

Scoring Multiple Retrieves: Throughout Australia several methods of scoring multiple retrieves have been adopted. The two most widely accepted involve either: a) Apportioning the total number of points available depending on the perceived difficulty of each leg of the Run, or b) Allocating full points for each leg of a Run, then the total number of points is averaged. At this time there is no universal agreement, nevertheless, it is important that individual Judges are consistent in their approach.

Restricted Stakes: If the Run chosen incorporates a Mark and a Blind Retrieve it is preferable that the Mark should be retrieved first. If the Blind is to be retrieved first, then Judges should ensure that the angle separating the Blind and the Mark is not less than 45 degrees.

Sending a Dog Twice: Restricted or All Age Stakes - if a dog returns to its handler without game and receives a second “send” from the Firing Point, and the judge considers that the offence of “Failure to complete the Retrieve” has been committed, it shall be given No Score. If a dog has taken an incorrect line and in only a few metres, the handler stops the dog , brings it back to make an adjustment to its line and re-sends the dog ; then the dog has incurred an infraction and must be penalised accordingly.

Beginner’s Tests: See ANKC Rule 45 – It is recommended that Judges start the dog and Handler from the Firing Point and that the Run should be from 20 to 50m in length.

The ANKC Code of Practice for Field and Retrieving Trial Judges states;
1. A Judge shall act with professional decorum at all times.
2. A Judge shall give every entry and handler a fair and equal opportunity.
3. Judges shall show courtesy whilst carrying out each judging appointment.
4. Judges shall be punctual in fulfilling their judging appointment.
5. A Judge shall present himself/herself in attire that is appropriate and comfortable for each judging appointment.
6. If an entry displays an obvious physical impediment that, in the Judge's opinion would be detrimental to the entry's health or is unable to be handled or is deemed to be savage or vicious (or aggressive), the entry should be excused from the trial and reported as per the Regulations.
7. A Judge shall not enter any dog at any Stake at which he/she is appointed to judge.
8. No member of a Judge's household (i.e. any person who resides at the same address) shall enter or handle a dog in any Stake at which the Judge officiates.
9. A Judge shall not solicit a judging appointment.
10. A Judge shall not solicit or seek the entry of any particular dog or dogs at a Trial at which the Judge is officiating.
11. A Judge shall not allow entries for a Trial, at which that person is judging, to be received at the Judge's address and/or be processed at the Judge's address.
12. Judges shall promptly complete all requirements of the Judging Contract. Any verbal acceptance of an appointment by a Judge shall be subject to the receipt of the contract within fourteen (14) days.
13. At the time of completing a contract the Judge shall inform the inviting body of any disability or limitation that would restrict him or help in carrying out the appointment.
14. A Judge shall honor each contract and is not free to accept an alternative contract that will affect his/her availability to fulfill the original contract, except with the written dispensation of the contracting body.
15. Accommodation provided to the Judge to fulfill an appointment is for the Judge only, except where prior mutual agreement has been reached with the contracting body for variation.
16. A Judge shall be responsible for the cost of all personal telephone calls, alcoholic beverages and any personal laundering except where mutual agreement has been reached with the contracting body at the time the contract is accepted.
17. A Judge who withdraws from a contracted appointment shall not be permitted to judge at any other trial wherever held on a date which would prevent him/her from attending the original contracted event.
18. Judges shall judge the Trial in accordance with the current ANKC Rules.
19. Judges shall not openly discuss with any other person the decision of any other Judge.

Judges’ Obligations: Judges are expected to stay for presentations. It is recommended that their dress and behaviour should be that befitting an adjudicator. Judges are encouraged to constrain their critique to positive comments. At all times Judges should speak to Stewards, other officials, the gallery and competitors in a courteous and respectful manner. In selecting Runs, Judges should be mindful on the need to allocate a “hide” area sufficient for the number of entries, including the provision for handlers to “air” their dogs, without having to invade the personal space of other dogs within the “hide”. Judges should also be mindful that they owe a “duty of care” to both the handlers and their competing dogs and therefore not expose handlers or dogs to unnecessary physical danger.
The location of galleries and their view of the Trial is another important consideration. Nevertheless, galleries should not be located behind and in line with a handler working a dog.
Judges are reminded of their obligation in regard to maintaining an ambit of equality in all aspects of a Trial. Each dog should be given the same opportunity to complete each run. For example; the practice of giving more time, or allowing more disobeyed commands to a dog just because it is leading on points going in to the last run is not considered acceptable. Judges should mindful of the truism, “It ain’t over until the fat lady sings” and provide all dogs with the same opportunity on all Runs.


PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING PROTESTS and DISPUTES AT TRIALS:
Judges, Trial Managers and other Officials should familiarize themselves with the procedures required to deal with disputes and protests.

The Protest Committee shall consist of the Trial Manager and 2 judges each with at least 3 years’ judging experience.
Immediately a verbal complaint is lodged with the Trial Manager, the judge shall be notified by the Trial Manager.
If no satisfactory conclusion can be reached between the Trial Manager and the judge, then the Trial Manager shall instigate formal proceedings.
The protest must be lodged in writing to the Trial Manager with the appropriate fee.
The judge shall be immediately notified that a written protest has been received and the Stake will be halted while the formal procedure takes place.
The Protest Committee shall convene and consider written reports from the Judge, the Judge’s Steward, and the competitor stating their versions of the events.
After consultation and if no immediate solution can be reached, the Protest Committee shall proceed with a full and complete investigation into the matter.
The Protest Committee will finalise a conclusive decision in accordance with the Rules of the ANKC and those of the Member Body.
The Trial Manager will then inform the Judge and the competitor of the Committee’s decision. In the event of the protest being deemed frivolous, or vexatious, the protest fee shall be forfeited.

Classification of Faults

The task of classifying the many faults that may surface during the course of a trial is onerous; they have therefore been listed in general terms only. The various infractions have been classified as; SERIOUS FAULTS, MAJOR FAULTS or MINOR FAULTS. Nevertheless, it should be remembered that an infraction may be so minor in degree that it barely warrants the implied penalty. Conversely, the degree of a given instance may be so significant that it merits a penalty greater than that implied, even to the point of the dog being given a No Score and/or disqualified from the Stake. Furthermore, in each of the three categories, the listed faults should not be given equal weight, since they are not of equal gravity or importance.


SERIOUS FAULTS

1. Repeated evidence of “poor nose” or lack of use of the ears and/or eyes.

2. Reluctance to enter either rough cover, water, mud, or any other situation involving unpleasant or difficult “going” for the dog, after having been ordered to do so on several occasions.

3. Returning to the handler, either without the game or without having been called in.

4. Stopping its hunt.

5. “Switching birds” i.e. giving up after a search for one bird, and going to “the area” of another “fall”, or dropping the bird it had retrieved and going for another.

6. “Blinking the Bird” i.e. ignoring game that it has found and leaving it.

7. Restraint by holding or touching the dog.

8. “Out of Control” i.e. paying little or no attention to repeated whistles, commands and/or directions from the handler.

9. Extreme “freeze”, i.e. a stubborn and prolonged unwillingness to release game on delivery.

10. Retrieving a decoy – a mandatory No Score, ANKC Rules 21 and 112 refer.

11. Breaking to Shot.

12. “Hard mouth”, or badly damaging game, which in the opinion of the judge, was entirely and solely caused by the dog.

13. Loud and prolonged whining or barking.

14. Failure to find game which it should have located.

15. Deliberate blocking by the handler so that the dog will not see all birds and/or “falls”

MAJOR FAULTS

Infractions in this category may be so slight as to warrant their consideration as only “minor faults”, or they may be so severe as to warrant their consideration as “serious faults”. Also, repetitions of “major faults” or a combination of several faults, may readily convert the total infraction into the “serious fault” category.
1. Failure to mark the “area of the fall”, requiring the dog to be handled to it; worse on a “single” or first bird of a “double” or “triple” than on the second or the third bird the dog is sent to retrieve.

2. Leaving “the area” or not going to it, and disturbing too much cover.

3. Reluctance to enter rough cover, water, mud or other situations involving unpleasant “going” for the dog.

4. Hunting in a slow, disinterested or lackadaisical manner, either at once or after a short hunt.

5. Poor style, including a disinterested attitude, a slow or reluctant departure, quest for game, or return with it.

6. “Popping on a Mark” i.e. looking back for directions on a “marked” bird before an extensive search has been undertaken.

7. Not stopping for a direction, after two or three whistles it should have heard.

8. Deliberate failure to take lines and various directions given to it; failure to hold lines and directions for more than a short distance.

9. Moderate whining or barking of short duration.

10. Going out of its way by land to a “fall”, without certainty of purpose to avoid going into water in a water retrieve

11. Noisy Handling – excessive shouting or prolonged use of very loud whistling.

12. Breaking out of the Hide either before or after the Shot is fired.

MINOR FAULTS

Minor faults may be either severe, repeated, or combinations of these minor infractions may amalgamate to be come “major faults”, or even “serious faults”. On the other hand, they may be so slight as to not warrant any penalty at all.

1. Going out of its way by land on the return from a water retrieve.

2. Lack of attention.

3. Poor line-manners; “heeling” poorly; not immediately taking and staying in the position designated by the handler; dropping game on delivery; jumping after the game after delivery; not remaining in position after delivery.

4. Slow pick-up of game; dropping game; handling game in a sloppy manner.

5. Marking territory especially on the way out to locate the game.

6. Unsteadiness at the Firing Point, including creeping.

7. Not stopping at the first whistle it should have heard, but stopping on the second or third.

8. “Popping on a Blind”, that is looking back for direction on a blind retrieve before taking the line or cast for a reasonable distance.

9. Occasional failure to take the handlers’ directions.

10. Occasional failure to hold the line, or directions given, for more than a few metres.

11. Slight “freezing” or reluctance to give up the game.

12. Slight short whining or one bark, on being sent.

13. Handling game roughly but without incurring any damage.

14. Moving in the Hide.

General Guidance for Setting Runs

• Do not have dogs facing the sun on marked retrieves.
• Keep runs within the distance requirements of the Rules, i.e. the max distance is 150 metres and in Novice Stakes it is desirable that Runs not exceed 100 metres.
• If terrain permits, the distance between the Control Point and Firing Point should exceed 10 metres.
• If terrain permits, make sure there is at least 1.5 metres between the pegs at the Firing Point.
• In setting a Run, ensure that you as judge can see the dog for most of the Run and especially as the dog picks up the bird/s. You cannot assess the performance of a dog that is out of sight.
• Put sufficient obstacles in a Run so that the dogs will differentiated themselves during the course of the test and not necessarily between the pegs.
• Do not put too many obstacles in the retrieve that are designed to specifically eliminate dogs from the competition.
• Make sure that tests include both land and in or through water.
• In water retrieves make sure dogs can enter and exit the water safely by avoiding hazards in the water that may cause injury the dog.
• Make sure the area of the fall is large enough to accommodate some variation in the cast.
• Try to avoid casting birds onto stony ground or where there may be hard objects that may damage the bird.
• Try to include an amount of sky line in the cast (for at least 50% of cast) of the bird especially as it falls.
• Avoid casting birds into heavy cover where it becomes a raffle if the dog finds the bird.
• Where practical design a Run to test the dog’s ability to judge the distance from the cast of the bird, not from the fall of the bird onto the ground. An obstacle such as a channel bank, ridge or reeds at thirty to forty metres will test this if the bird is cast at a distance behind the obstacle.
• If a walk up retrieve is used make sure the retrieve is not too long (say 60 metres) and that the dog is generally facing the bird as it is cast.

[Robert Tawton]

Hi All a last minute change to the ACT submission.

Rule No 7 (l)
Current Rule
Hard Mouth - A dog is deemed to be hard-mouthed when there is unmistakable evidence of any markings or damage on game retrieved due to biting or crunching by the dog. The penalty as defined on the score sheet should be relative to the marking or damage. Where there is deliberate squeezing of game so that the bones break and the Judge considers that the game is unfit for the table, the Judge may apply Rule 55 and disqualify the dog.

Proposed Rule
Hard Mouth - A dog is deemed to be hard-mouthed when there is unmistakable evidence of any markings or damage on game retrieved due to biting or crunching by the dog. The penalty as defined on the score sheet should be relative to the marking or damage. Where there is deliberate squeezing of game so that the bones break and the Judge considers that the game is unfit for the table, the Judge may apply Rule 58 and disqualify the dog.

Rationale
Correcting a typographical error in the current Rules – delete reference to Rule 55 and insert Rule 58.

[Gareth Tawton]

Hi everyone,

As you can see the ACT has a huge number of changes to the rules. The majority are language and layout changes to make the rules easier reading. I thought it might help to give a rough list of the majors changes we are suggesting. You will need to read our full rule change post for the exact wording but in simple terms.

1. A double blind to have 10 degrees of seperation in AA and 45 deg in Rest

2. Clarify that the first leg of a two bird can be a blind.

3. delete deby. brace stake and the various water tests.

4. Make AA a max of 4 runs, State champs a min of 6 runs and the national a min of 7 runs.

5. Allow 5 wins in Rest with 3 to gain RRD. If blind is picked up before a mark in restricted then must be 45degrees of seperation

6. Allow a choice of front or side delivery as long as the dog comes directly to you and is stationary.

7. Master score sheets with all completing dogs to be made available at the completion of trial to handlers upon request.

8. "Inline" retreives allow the handler to choose pick up order not the judge.

9. Add a new deduction to a max of 5 points for breaking from the hide.

10. Include a new title of Grand Rt CH

11. To recognise and include the Guideline to judges with amendements to allow for any new rule changes as this was writtern to the current rules.

I hope this make a little lighter reading


Gareth

[Prue Winkfield]

Thanks Gareth - especially as I only have 20hrs a month download before it start costing heaps!